And God went on to say, land to sprout, grass

Genesis 1:11 says:

"And God went on to say, land to sprout, grass [...] and became well"

With the expression "became well" means that the vegetation was created,

ie was in existence yet Genesis 1:12 the next verse says:

"And the earth began to produce grass, vegetation ..."

But if the earth began to produce grass why the above verse says,  

the grass "had become"?  

Then verse 12 at the end mentions:

"And God saw that it was good"

here and the grass was to be, as specifically mentions that God saw,

this occurred in the third day

But Genesis 2:5 says very close to the creation of man,

on the sixth day still no grass, as it had rained.

So we have to Genesis chapter 1 mentioned twice that Jehovah created the grass

and Chapter 2 is not that there was gushing rain.

This situation leads some to doubt the Scriptures, on the other hand many people

willing to accept the Bible without knowing say the story is completed, which is

feeling satisfied so absurd but believe that the story is one and is viewed from 

different angles. 

However, this sacred mystery solved.

The question is this

Was there grass when the Bible says that there?

the answer is YES

The Holy Scripture then speaks of three different places where each of them

no grass and vegetation.

Does the Bible give support to the idea that there are three different creations?

Look at 2 Corinthians 12:2:

"I know a man in Christ who fourteen years ago, whether in the body I do not know

out of the body I do not know, God knows, was caught up to the third heaven "

Then the Bible testifies to three different places, as a man was caught up to the third heaven

Thus Genesis 1 and 2 is perfectly consistent as this talking about three different places

As it is written:

"Oh the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of the Lord"

Romans 11:33